While it’s not
uncommon to miss details of a story the first time through, it’s unlikely this
was the reason I skimmed over the ones I did. Considering that Bender makes
sure Lisa is only supplying us with limited information about herself, it would
seem to indicate that we would pay closer attention to the details she does give us. So instead, I believe it
is Lisa’s unusual narrating style that caused points about her to go over my
head. Bender repeatedly flirts with
the fairytale genre over the course of the story. As a reader who hadn’t read
much slip-stream before, trying to read it as a fairytale made it easier for me
to process. But Lisa disrupted my task – she simply is not a fairytale
narrator, who would typically be a sort of invisible third party that gives the
facts and nothing but the facts, guiding us towards the moral. No, she is too
complex a human to be invisible, and her narrating style is not factual but a
choppy narration full of questionable information. In Lisa, Bender cleverly
blends the fairytale protagonist with the narrator. I had to make her one or
the other, so I broke her down by emitting details, and in the process managed
to 2-dimensionalize her.
No comments:
Post a Comment